|
June 5 : March 7 : March
5
June 5, 2003
- USSC Chavez v. Martinez Decision
On Tuesday, May 27, the Supreme Court issued its long awaited
decision in Chavez v. Martinez. The case involved a civil rights suit
by an arrestee against a police officer for questioning him without
complying with the Miranda rule. The arrestee was never prosecuted, and
his statement was never used in a criminal case.
Although the Court was deeply divided, the following points can be
pieced together from the several opinions:
1. Questioning an arrestee without complying with the Miranda rule
(reading warnings, ceasing questioning upon request) does not, by
itself, violate the Fifth Amendment. A violation would only occur if
and when the statements were used against the arrestee in a criminal case.
2. Whether more severe questioning tactics by the police could
violate the Fifth Amendment is not resolved.
3. Extracting a confession by brutal means that "shocks the
conscience" is a violation of the Due Process Clause and the civil
rights statutes, as has long been established. (Brown v. Mississippi;
Screws v. United States)
The Ninth Circuit's decision in favor of the arrestee on Fifth
Amendment grounds was reversed. The case was remanded for consideration
of the Due Process claim.
March 7, 2003
- COURT UPHOLDS THREE-STRIKES-AND-YOU'RE-OUT LAW
A divided Supreme Court upheld today long sentences meted out
under California's three-strikes-and-you're-out law, ruling
that a prison term of 25 years to life is not too harsh for
a small-time thief who shoplifted golf clubs, the Associated
Press reported. The court divided, 5-4, in two cases testing
the limits of California's Proposition 184, intended to close
the revolving prison door for criminals with lengthy, violent
records. "When the California legislature enacted the three-strikes
law, it made a judgment that protecting the public safety requires
incapacitating criminals who have already been convicted of
at least one serious or violent crime," Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
wrote for the majority. The three-strikes law mandates a sentence
ranging from 25 years to life in prison for defendants convicted
of any felony if they have already been found guilty of two
serious or violent felonies. In dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer
said the lengthy sentence handed down to Gary Albert Ewing for
stealing golf clubs is a rare example of a sentence that is
so out of proportion to the crime that it is unconstitutional.
Click to read the full opinion: Ewing
v. California
- MEGAN'S LAWS UPHELD IN TWO HIGH COURT RULINGS
The Supreme Court ruled today that states may put pictures
of convicted sex offenders on the Internet, a victory for states
that use the Web to warn of potential predators in neighborhoods.
In a separate narrow ruling, the Associated Press reported that
the court turned back a challenge From offenders who argued
they deserved a chance to prove they are not dangerous to avoid
having their pictures and addresses put on the Internet. The
6-3 decisions came in the Supreme Court's first review of what
are known as Megan's laws -- and have far-reaching implications
because every state and the federal government have sex-offender
registry laws. The cases, from Alaska and Connecticut, required
justices to balance the rights of offenders with the public
safety interest in keeping tabs on people who may commit more
sex crimes. The court came down on the side of public safety
in the Alaska case, but left the door open for future constitutional
challenges of Megan's laws in the second case.
Click to read the full opinions: Connecticut
Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Doe & Smith
v. Doe
March 5, 2003
- Cybercrime Conference Transcripts
The transcripts of the proceedings of the Federalist Society's
full-day conference on Cybercrime issues have been posted. The
Conference featured panels on Technological methods, International
Cooperation and Public/Private Sector Cooperation and addresses
by Hon. John Malcolm, U.S. Department of Justice and Hon. Claude
Allen, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Please
click HERE
to access the transcript. (PDF)
|